Dawn Fewell commented on: Group 4
Kimberly Neal commented on: Group 1
Oscar Guajardo commented on: Group 4
Kathryn Brady commented on: Group 1
Adult Education Organizations and
Programs
The Carnegie Corporation of New
York and The United States Armed Forces
Group 3: Dawn Fewell, Kimberly Neal, Oscar Guajardo,
Kathryn Brady
EDAC 631 Adult and Community
Education
Ball State University
Abstract
This paper discusses two
organizations that have contributed to the field of adult education: the United
States military and the Carnegie Corporation of New York. It will provide a description of each
organization’s history, mission, and goals, in addition to an explanation of the
main programs offered through each. A
comparison of the two entities will highlight their similarities and
differences and demonstrate how the mission and goals impact their management
and operation. The implications related
to adult learning, and what knowledge we can gain through the study of these
two organizations will provide a means by which to increase our understanding
of adult education as a whole.
Introduction
The Carnegie
Corporation of New York
There are many influential organizations
and programs in the history of adult education worth mentioning and studying.
The movement for adult education in the third historical period of adult
education (1870s to 1930s) in the United
States included educational institutions and government agencies, but also
labor unions, women’s suffrage groups, socialists, health and welfare agencies,
political parties and religious organizations; some which collaborated in the
“development of new institutional forms for the provisions of adult education”
which were “largely intended to provide educational solutions to the social
question of the emergent working class”. Moreover, these educational activities
served as an organizing tool for some groups or, for others, as a response to
rising radical and communist sentiments (Hake, 2010, p.16). The Carnegie
Corporation, along with the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of
Teaching, is among these institutions. Both historians and researchers
repeatedly mention both organizations – one entity cannot be separated from the
other, as they come from the same funding source and are aimed at the same
goals.
The Carnegie Foundation was funded by
Andrew Carnegie in 1905 and chartered by an act of the United States congress
in 1906; the Carnegie Corporation of New York is a philanthropy foundation
established in 1911 in a trust mainly to extend “conventional ways” to
distribute Carnegie’s extensive wealth; but, fundamentally “to promote the
advancement and diffusion of knowledge and understanding” among the population
(“Our History”, n.d.,para 1). The
Carnegie Foundation describes itself as an “independent policy and research
center, whose primary activities of research and writing have resulted in
published reports on every level of education” (“Foundation History”, n.d.,
para1), which has greatly helped the Carnegie Corporation distribute it funds
for educational endeavors; moreover, its objective has also been to achieve
meaningful, extensive, and lasting improvements to education.
The United States Armed
Forces
The history of our nation’s military
stretches as far back as 1636 when the first militia in the New World
officially met in Salem, Massachusetts.
These individual groups would eventually become what is now the Army
National Guard in 1916 (“Army National Guard History”,n.d.,para.1). As the Revolutionary War unfolded it sparked
the creation of the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps in 1775. In an effort to spearhead our national
defense the War Department formed in 1789.
Although it would later become the Department of the Army it was the
precursor to what we now refer to as the Department of Defense (DOD), which
provides oversight of all military personnel and operations around the
world. The Coast Guard was added in 1790
and the Air Force was officially named in 1947 (“About the Department of
Defense”, 2017). Three main themes have
remained dominate throughout the history of the United States military. The first is pluralism, or the idea of
multiple groups with authority can and will exist in order to accomplish a
common goal. Second is expansionism, in
both a geographical and territorial sense, and third, a dedication to
maintaining civilian control over the armed forces. The president remains the commander in chief
of all five branches of the military. In
addition he has the authority to activate the National Guard units in any or
all of our fifty states .
According to the official DOD
website, “The mission of the Department of Defense is to provide the military
forces needed to deter war and to protect the security of our country.” (“About
the Department of Defense”, 2017) At
first glance it may not appear that adult education would play a vital role in
such a broad and multifaceted mission; however, education has been identified
not only as a priority, but a necessity evolving from the need for basic
literacy during Revolutionary war times to maintaining the highly sophisticated
weapon systems of our modern military, as well as providing soldiers and sailors
with the means for critical decision making and adaption to the ever-changing
and more complex combat theatre they find themselves in during deployment
(Persyn and Polson, 2012). Additionally,
as our nation’s largest employer the DOD is also the largest provider of adult
education with a multi-billion dollar budget.
The military comprises approximately 1.4 million of its 3.2 million
members (Persyn and Polson, 2012).
The United States military has
focused on several main goals in terms of education and training of
adults. The first is providing literacy
education to those service members who are in need of additional basic adult
education skills (Anderson, 1996). The
second is helping to shoulder the financial burden on those who wish to pursue education
and training beyond their required military training either during their active
duty time, or after their separation from service (Anderson, 1996). The third goal is to assist veterans with the
transition into civilian life through articulation of college credit for their
military training and job experience (Anderson, 2006).
Main
Programs
The Carnegie
Corporation of New York
After World War I, the Carnegie
Corporation (and Foundation) developed an interest in lifelong learning but
also of adult education as a logical continuation of Andre Carnegie’s long time
work – due to his involvement and funding of public libraries. Therefore, the
Corporation was one of the first organizations to focus on and devote time,
money, and energy towards a thorough and systematic public policy on adult
education and introduced many large funding grants for the education of this
population. The beginning of this involvement started in the Americanization
Movement which focused on immigrant education programs with the purpose of
integration and assimilation. A comprehensive 1918 study in literacy (and
education in general) gave strong confirmation of the countries’ failures to
give enough and serious attention to the Americanization of thousands of
immigrants. Plus, it exposed many issues and flaws with the public and higher
education agencies. According to Rose (1990), the study was evidence and served
as the “prototype for future Carnegie interest in the education of adults”: In
1923, a new corporation President, Frederick P. Keppel, established new
mandates and priorities in the establishment of future grants for adult
education. Keppel had experience in this new educational endeavor. “He knew
about the wartime programs of education for soldiers and other activities in
adult education” (Sticht, 2002) as he worked as the assistant secretary of war
during the Word War. According to Rose (1990), “in 1924 the foundation began to
explore the possibility of funding projects in adult education”.
According to Sticht (2002), the Carnegie
Foundation, along with National Education Association, supported the
advancement of adult education through the development of the “adult education
occupation” by assisting in the formation of an association for the teaching
and training of adult education professionals and by recommending policies and
supporting adult education at levels of the federal and states governments. In
1926, a group of adult educators and American education leaders, with the
support and sponsorship of the Carnegie Corporation, formed the American
Association for Adult Education (AAAE) which is considered by some as a
defining feature in adult education history mainly because its existence
organized adult education and gave it national visibility as needing to be on
its own on a separate branch of education.
In the beginning, the AAAE was supposed
to be an independent organization with the purpose of holding annual national
conferences, producing publications and programs, conducting research, and
creating other activities that would advance adult education. However,
according to Rose (1990), the Carnegie Corporation invested in its development
(from 1926 until 1940) and it had other agendas. Keppel committed Carnegie
Corporation foundation to the administrative support of the association, it was
headed by Morse Cartwright (Keppel's former assistant), and the association
purposely made “funding recommendations to the Corporation about adult
education projects”. Rose (1990) states
that this was a deliberate move not only to deal with the “internal
organizational and fiscal pressures” of the AAAE, but more importantly to
concentrate Carnegie's “dissatisfaction with the current system of education
within the United States”.
As stated above, the 1918
Americanization study was the “prototype for future Carnegie interest in the
education of adults”. The study gave testimony to the criticism surrounding the
expansion of educational systems after the war. One of the strongest critics
came from Henry Pritchett, and educator and President of the Carnegie
Foundation (and acting President of the Carnegie Corporation). Pritchett’s main
concern was the rapid expansion of the school system after the war, the
expenses associated with programs and services, and the massive bureaucratic
structure related to the system. According to Rose (1990), his worries “were
closely allied to worries about who was attending the nation's schools and
colleges as well as what they were learning and whether society would
ultimately benefit from the emphasis on mass education”. In Pritchett’s view,
the swift growth was not solving the problem of education; in fact he believed
that simultaneously “the entire educational system was being destroyed in the
process”.
In it beginning, the American
Association for Adult Education (AAAE) produced different types of publications
including The Journal of Adult Education
in order to “disseminate information about adult education and to promote the
use of the term” (Sticht, 2002). Moreover, Keppel’s established mandates and
priorities limiting membership to educators and organizations who had "a
direct and usually professional interest in adult education" (Rose, 1990).
The AAAE, operated and supported by the Carnegie Corporation until 1941,
defined the term “adult education” and aimed to separate it as its own branch
of education. But, adult education did not occur for reasons associated with
the expansion of the field; instead, adult education was the result of the
criticism of public and university education at the time.
The United States Armed
Forces
Due to the sheer size and unique nature
of each branch of the military, the educational programs are structured in one
of two ways: Some programs are available
to all members, while others are
unique to an individual branch such
as only the Navy. All programs,
regardless of availability, are managed
by the individual member’s respective branch.
The military continues to recognize the
importance of literacy education and maintains its goal of providing programs
to enhance adult basic education skills through its Army Continuing Education
System. It was the first organization to
establish a test to determine the equivalency of a high school education, which
helped increase education and employment opportunities for members after World
War II, and its influence continues today in the form of the General
Equivalency Diploma (GED) test (Anderson, 2006).
The armed forces continues its efforts
to make educational opportunities accessible to military member in order to
raise employability and increase upward mobility of its members by offering
several Voluntary Education Programs that help offset the financial cost
associated with a college education. The
first major step towards that goal began with the democratization of higher
education through arguably one of the most important pieces of legislation ever
passed in the history of our Congress, the G.I. Bill (Anderson, 1996) Members of the military make a small
investment during the first year of enlistment, and then that investment is
paired with funds from the government to be used for post-secondary training or
college education upon separation from service.
It has been updated and revised since its creation in 1944, and is still
available to all incoming enlistees today. Several other programs serve to
accomplish this goal as well such as the Tuition Assistance program that encourages
active duty personnel to pursue a college education during their enlistment,
rather than waiting until they separated from service. This was a model that
eventually found its way into the civilian world as employers began offering
college tuition assistance to their employees (Anderson, 1996). The Defense Activity for Non-Traditional
Educational Support (DANTES) is a program that connects military members with
academic counselors, college preparation exams such as the SAT and ACT, GED,
and college credit tests (CLEP).
Included in the DANTES systems is the Servicemembers Opportunity
Colleges program that offers college courses on military installations around
the globe. Classes are taught in foreign
countries, on naval ships, or via distance education. Each branch of the military has numerous
programs that support this goal (see Table 2) such as the College Fund, eArmyU,
Student Loan Repayment Program, Community College of the Air Force, or the
Coast Guard Foundation Grant (“Military Education Benefits User’s Guide”,
n.d.).
A vital program that helps veterans
transition to the civilian workplace is the articulation of college credit for
military training and job experience through the Military Evaluations Program
(MEP). In partnership with the American
Council on Education, MEP has worked tirelessly towards this effort and service members
have been awarded countless hours of college credit going back even to the time
of World War II. The accomplishments of
this program have filtered into the civilian world as well and act as a model
for translating government, business, and industry training into college credit
(Anderson, 1996).
Comparison
Looking at the United States Armed
Forces and The Carnegie Corporation, we see that both organizations have placed
a priority on the development of adult education. It is an integral part of
their mission and objectives and as a result, they both allocate significant
resources in achieving the same. Both
entities seek to advance knowledge and understanding, albeit initially for
different purposes; however, in the end it benefits the individual, the adult
education sector, and our nation. Education
in the military remains a priority and plays a vital role as a means of
equipping the members of the military with the tools required for them to learn
their jobs and achieve their objectives, but once they separate from service they
are ready to contribute to the civilian workplace, and their upward mobility is
increased as well so in earning higher wages they in turn contribute more to
the nation’s economy. The Carnegie
Corporation operates in the form of a philanthropic organization with the
emphasis laid upon the advancement of learning and education among the people. It disburses a number of grants to support
civic education and awareness programs to further ideals such as democracy and
government. These ideals are supported
and defended by our military, and contribute to the well-being of our
educational system and our country.
The programs and initiatives funded
by the Carnegie Corporation relating to libraries and educational endeavors go
hand-in-hand with the military’s dedication to literacy and basic adult
education. These two organizations also
support higher education and training through the various programs provided for
their members that help shoulder the individual financial burden of adult
education. The Armed Forces and the
Carnegie foundation while sharing some similar objectives, employ different
approaches to achieving these objectives.
The military’s educational benefits are more individualized and focus on
helping each soldier reach their potential, while Carnegie’s goals are broader
and the distribution of funds is often to a group or organization who can then,
in turn, help individuals. The money
used by these two organizations comes from different sources, but the end
result is ultimately the same – helping adults increase their knowledge and
education.
Both organizations have made
historically significant contributions to the field of adult education, but in
very different ways. The formation of
the American Association for Adult Education (AAAE) gave adult educators a
voice and helped to establish adult education as a unique and important sector
of education. The publication of The Journal of Adult Education has
served as a means to share information among adult educators and the research
conducted by the Carnegie Corporation has contributed to education policies,
and continues to make substantial contributions to the field. The United States military made college
education a reality for lower income individuals for the first time in our
country by creating the G.I. Bill. The use
of standardized testing by the armed forces resulted in the first method to
evaluate a high school education and spurred the creation of the GED test still
used today to help individuals take the first step towards educational
attainment, better jobs, and a better life.
The military was also the first organization to truly recognize the
value of job experience and created the Military Evaluation Program to help
individuals earn college credit for their knowledge and experience gained
during their enlistment.
Implications
There are many different
organizations and programs in the United States; however, the two organizations
focused in this paper began many years ago concentrating on education and still
have a major impact on adult education today.
The United States Armed Forces created the awareness for the necessity
of adult literacy and what started as a simple screening process for the
military is now the General Equivalency Diploma (GED) test today. This is a great example of how adult
education organization can share information about their programs with others
in order to expand the benefits of a particular program to a larger population
of adults. The GED has now been used to
help countless adults earn a certificate which improves their chances to get a
better job or continue their higher education.
The military has also provided a way for articulation of workplace
skills, on-the-job-training, and military training into college credit through
the Military Evaluation Program and the American Council on Education. By partnering with the ACE and pooling
knowledge and resources from both organizations more adults are able to receive
credit and the program has expanded into the business, industry, and government
sectors.
The nature of adult education is
complex and varied. Both organizations
have recognized this and made substantial contributions to the field in a
variety of ways. Carnegie Corporation
has contributed millions of dollars to the building of libraries across
America. Libraries provide a means for
people of all ages to continue to learn through formal and non-formal education. The military realized that to keep pace with
the advances in technology and continue to defend our nation in a global world
enlisted soldiers needed more than a high school education and so they created
the G.I. Bill. This changed the face of
college campuses and adult education forever, and demonstrates the importance
of alignment of workforce needs to adult education programming. These two organizations understood that there
is no “one size fits all” program design in adult education, and this important
factor still holds true for adult and community educators today.
Andrew Carnegie realized that change
needed to happen at the government level in order to improve education, and in
turn improve our country. The Carnegie
Corporation has impacted many teachers through federal and state policies which
have supported continuing education for educators. With the help of the Carnegie Corporation,
the American Association for Adult Education (AAAE) was formed, and for the
first time adult education began to be viewed as a distinct and separate area
of education. The AAAE is the heart of
what adult education is about which is providing adult fulfillment and positive
social change through life-long learning.
AAAE publishes leading adult education journals such as The Journal of Adult Education which
provides educators with the resources to continue their education.
Both the Carnegie Corporation and the
United States Armed Forces have benefited mutually with adult education and
will continue to do so through past and current contributions to the continued
education of adults. The study of these
two organizations has shown us how people working together can identify needs
and help to come up with a variety of programs and solutions to meet those
needs that acknowledge and encompass the many factors that affect educational
attainment for adults such as legislative and policy changes, research and
continuing education for adult educators, literacy and adult basic education,
financial help for individuals, and improved community resources.
References
Anderson,
C.A. (2006, July). Remembering those who
have made a difference in United States
military
voluntary education. Presented at Department of Defense
Worldwide Education Symposium, Orlando, FL.
Anderson,
C.A. (1996, October). Some major
contributions of the military to the field of adult
and
continuing education in the United States (A work in progress). Presented
at Annual Meeting of the American Association for Adult and Continuing
Education, Charlotte, NC.
Carnegie
Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (n.d.). Foundation
History. Retrieved
March
18, 2017, https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/who-we-are/foundation-history/
Hake, B. (2010). Rewriting the History of Adult Education: The Search
for Narrative Structures.
International
Encyclopedia of Education,
96-101. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00017-8
Military.com. (n.d.). Military education benefits user’s guide. Retrieved March 17, 2017,
Persyn,
J. M., & Polson, C. J. (2012). Evolution and influence of military adult
education. New
Directions For Adult & Continuing
Education, 2012(136), 5-16. doi:10.1002/ace.20031
Rose, Amy D. (1990). Challenging the
System: The
Adult Education Movement and the
Educational Bureaucracy of the 1920s. In R.W. Rohfeld (ed.), Breaking New Ground: The
Development of Adult and Workers' Education in North America. Preceedings from the
Syracuse University Kellogg
Project's First Visiting Scholar Conference in the History of Adult Education. Syracuse, New York. Retrieved March 12, 2017,
http://roghiemstra.com/breaking.html
Sticht, T. G. (2002) The Rise of the Adult Education and Literacy System
in the United States:
1600-2000. Vol. 3, ed. Comings, J. E., Smith, C. E., &
Garner, B. E. (n.d.). San Francisco, CA:
U.S.
Department of Defense. (2017, January 27). About
the Department of Defense (DOD).
Retrieved March 13, 2017, https://www.defense.gov/About
Carnegie Corporation of New York. (n.d.).Our History. Retrieved March 14, 2017,
https://www.carnegie.org/about/our-history/
Table 1
|
||
Topics:
|
The Carnegie
Corporation of New York
|
The United States
military
|
Location
|
Carnegie
Corporation of New York
437 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10022
Carnegie
Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
51 Vista Lane Stanford, CA 94305 |
The US Armed
forces are located all over the globe.
Educational activities and opportunities are worldwide as well.
|
Year
it was founded
|
The Carnegie Foundation was funded by Andre Carnegie in
1905, and chartered by an act of the United States congress in 1906.
The Carnegie Corporation of New York was established in
1911.
|
Each agency of
the Armed Forces had its own beginnings:
·
In
1636 - National Guard.
·
The
American Revolution - Army, Navy, and Marines in 1775.
·
1790
the Coast Guard was added
·
The
Air Force was formed in 1947.
·
The
War Department was formed in 1789, which later turned into the Department of
the Army. It was replaced by the
Department of Defense, officially named in 1949
3 main themes our
Armed Forces:
1.
Pluralism
2.
Expansionism
3.
Civilian
Control
|
Mission/Overall
Goals
|
Carnegie
established his philanthropic trust with a broad mission to “promote the
advancement and diffusion of knowledge and understanding.”
The work of the
Carnegie Corporation focuses on issues that Andrew Carnegie considered of
outmost importance:
the advancement
of education and knowledge.
|
·
The
mission of the Department of Defense is to provide the military forces needed
to deter war and to protect the security of our country.
·
The
overall goal of creating educational benefits and opportunities for
Servicemembers began with basic literacy needs. This morphed into the need for more highly
educated enlisted members to keep pace with new technologies and complex
combat theatres.
·
Helping
veterans transition into civilian life.
·
Articulating
college credit for military training and experience
|
How
were the programs organized?
|
The Carnegie
Corporation funds grants based on its
broad mission in the following areas:
§
Education
§
Higher Education and Research
§
|
·
Some
programs are available to all Servicemembers.
·
Each
arm has shared and unique programs. Table 2
·
Each
branch manages programs for respective servicemembers
|
Goals
these organizations wish to achieve through these programs.
|
§ Education
– to better opportunities for American students to learn the skills they need
to compete in a global economy
§
Special Projects – in accordance to the
Corporation’s broad mission
|
1.
Democratization
of higher education. Get enlisted
soldiers to enroll in college – G.I. Bill
2.
Make
educational opportunities accessible to military members to raise
employability and upward mobility – Voluntary Education Programs &
DANTES:
-Tuition
Assistance, Servicemembers Opportunity Colleges, eArmyU, College Fund,
Student Loan Repayment, Community College of the Air Force, etc. (Table 2)
3.
Articulation
of workplace skills, on-the-job-training, and military training into college
credit – American Council on Education
4.
Standardized
testing for GED/Literacy Education – Army Continuing Education System, – U.S.
Armed Forces Institute, DANTES
|
Why
were they organized differently/similarly?
|
Carnegie
Corporation has broad goals, so their organization is more focused on areas
such as research, building of libraries and other community resources,
support of AAAE and The Journal of
Adult Education to share information and influence policy change.
|
·
The
military’s primary goal is to properly train and educate personnel in order
to do their job and accomplish the mission.
However, it has become apparent that it is a benefit to the soldier,
the military, and the country to increase educational attainment.
·
It
creates upward mobility, greater employability, and in turn military member
contribute more to the country both from an economic and social aspect.
It is
a win-win-win situation from a long term prospective.
|
Implications
|
Since the founder left a very broad
mandate, the Carnegie Corporation has funded and vast and diverse projects,
programs and causes: Public Libraries, literacy education, adult education,
studies and research, and policy.
In the case of adult education, the Carnegie Corporation
was influential in creating, defining and disseminating the term “adult
education” and succeeded in separating it as its own branch of education.
|
·
Military
and Adult Education have benefited mutually from each other, and will
continue to do so.
·
Standardized
testing for screening purposes originated with the military – GED in
particular.
·
Articulation
of military training and job experience into college credit has a huge
impact.
·
Military
is one of the biggest advocates of continuing education – this aligns with
adult and community education goals as well.
|
Table 2
|
|
Army Volunteer
Education Programs
|
·
GoArmyEd
·
Tuition
Assistance
·
Servicemembers
Opportunity Colleges
·
eArmyU
·
The
Army College Fund
·
Student
Loan Repayment Program
|
Navy Volunteer
Education Programs
|
·
Navy
Advanced Education Voucher
·
Navy
Graduate Education Voucher
·
Tuition
Assistance
·
Servicemembers
Opportunity College
·
College-At-Sea
(NCPACE)
·
Seaman
to Admiral (STA-21)
·
Navy
Marine Corps Relief Society Grants
|
Air Force
Volunteer Education Programs
|
·
Tuition
Assistance
·
Community
College of the Air Force
·
Servicemembers
Opportunity College
·
Student
Loan Repayment Program
·
Air
Force Aid Society
·
Spouse
Tuition Assistance Program
|
Marines Volunteer
Education Programs
|
·
Marine
Deployed Education Programs
·
Library
Programs
·
Military
Academic Skills Program (MASP)
·
Tuition
Assistance
·
United
Services Military Apprenticeship Program (USMAP)
·
Sailor/Marine
American Council on Education Registry Transcript (SMART)
·
Servicemembers
Opportunity Colleges
·
Spouse
Tuition Assistance (TA)
|
Coast Guard
Volunteer Education Programs
|
·
Tuition
Assistance
·
Servicemembers
Opportunity College
·
Servicemembers
Opportunity College Afloat
·
Coast
Guard Foundation Grant
·
Coast
Guard Mutual Assistance
·
Advanced
Education Programs
·
Education
credit testing for spouses
|
Source: www.military.com
Hello Group #3,
ReplyDeleteYour group did an exceptional job describing both, The Carnegie Corporation of New York and The United States Armed Forces which I personally knew nothing about. So, I appreciate the detailed information regarding both organizations! It was interesting to learn about the volunteer educational programs that are offered as well and the fact that spouses are also offered benefits of education (tuition assistance). Again, great job and research on these two organizations. I learned a lot by reading your paper!
Thanks,
Jen
Hi Group 3,
ReplyDeleteI am curious at to why there is a split in the formatting in your paper. Under the implications section, why is there not a "Carnegie" and "US Armed Forces" subsection? I'm also curious with these both being established programs as to why there weren't sources examining the implications of your programs?
Additionally, in looking at citations, APA requires a page/paragraph number for direct quotes, but not for when you cite the idea/concept/information in your own words. For instance, take the first paragraph from the first Harry Potter book. Here are two ways the sentence in an APA paper could be written:
The Dursleys prided themselves in appearing normal to the outside world (Rowling, 1997).
--OR--
The Dursleys "were proud to say that they were perfectly normal, thank you very much" (Rowling, 1997, p. 1).
Another big difference between APA and MLA is in the resources page. APA does not require you to say what day you viewed (i.e. "retrieved") an article online.
BSU has a writing center that you can attend via an online appointment if need be. An additional resource that I find to be very useful is the PurdueOWL.
Good luck in your future work. Compiling different people's pieces can be very frustrating and time-consuming.
The Carnegie Corporation of New York vs. The United States Military
ReplyDeleteGood job on your paper group three. You did a great job on your research and presentation of material. One difference between the two groups that I thought could have gotten more attention was the difference in the recipients and the benefits each received. For example, the military educated soldiers and that had a direct benefit to them and their families and later a social benefit when they got out. The Carnegie Corporation helped educate Americans from all walks of life. Their educational programs educated people in the poorest communities and helped build libraries in remote areas in this country that could not have done so on their own. I thought that point would have been an interesting comparison point.
Hello Mike,
DeleteThat is an interesting point. The general population which benefits from these benefits varies. I don't know specifically about education benefits in the military but VA benefits like health, compensation, etc can vary based on disability and so on. However, these benefits are reserved to veterans/active duty and their families.
Group 3: I enjoyed reading more about both the The Carnegie Corporation of New York and The United States military. Although my dad served in the United State military for 20 years, I didn't really know much about the military before seeing your paper. It's extremely beneficial that the military provides a program (MEP) to help veterans transition to the civilian workplace. It makes sense but I don't think I realized that one of the goals of the military was to provide a helpful transition into civilian life. Thanks again---I learned a lot reading your paper.
ReplyDelete